Search Results

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine how ophthalmological features, screen exposure duration, and break habits among office employees affect ocular surface parameters.
METHODS: This single-center cross-sectional study involved two assessments on the same day: one before and one after a visual display terminal task. During the initial assessment, information on screen use was gathered, and refractive error, anterior segment examination, tear breakup time, and Schirmer test measurements were conducted. Participants tracked their screen usage and break durations throughout the day. At the end of the workday, tear breakup time and Schirmer I tests were repeated. Baseline and follow-up results were compared, and regression analysis was performed to identify factors linked to tear breakup time reduction.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 60 female office employees. Their mean screen time was 269.26 ± 70.21 min, with an average break duration of 151.93 ± 46.24 min. Tear breakup time at the second assessment (6.38 ± 2.70) was significantly lower than at baseline (8.62 ± 2.73) (p<0.001), whereas Schirmer test scores showed no significant change (p>0.05). Tear breakup time reduction was noted in 54 participants (90.0%), with a significant association between tear breakup time decrease percentage and screen exposure (p=0.001, r=0.463). Regression analysis showed that uncorrected or undercorrected refractive error was an independent risk factor for a ≥30% tear breakup time reduction, while taking more frequent short breaks (<15 min) acted as a protective factor.
CONCLUSIONS: Taking more frequent short breaks (<15 min) and correcting refractive errors help prevent intra-day tear breakup time decline during visual display terminal use. Structuring breaks to support tear film stability is advisable for occupations that require regular visual display terminal tasks.

Keywords: Tear film; Screen time; Tear breakup time; Office workers; Protective factors; Lacerations;  Refractive errors; Risk factors.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of varying degrees of trabeculotomy during gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy surgery on postoperative intraocular pressure reduction and surgical success.
METHODS: Patients who underwent gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (at least 90°) for open-angle glaucoma and had a follow-up period of at least 12 months were included. Patients were grouped according to trabeculotomy degree (Group 1: 90°<θ≤180°; Group 2: 180°<θ<360°; Group 3: θ=360°). Ophthalmic examination findings, intraocular pressure measurements, number of antiglaucoma medications, and complications were recorded. Surgical success was defined as intraocular pressure <15 mmHg with at least a 20% reduction; surgical failure was defined as failure to meet this criterion or the need for additional surgery.
RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were included: 20 in Group 1, 24 in Group 2, and 56 in Group 3. Intraocular pressure levels differed significantly only in the first postoperative month (p=0.013). At 12 months, intraocular pressure levels, percentage reduction in intraocular pressure, and mean number of antiglaucoma medications did not differ significantly (p>0.05). No correlation was found between trabeculotomy degree and percentage intraocular pressure reduction (p=0.173). At 12 months, surgical success rates were similar (60.0%, 58.3%, and 64.3% for Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Complication rates were also comparable among the groups.
CONCLUSION: The degree of trabeculotomy did not affect surgical success over a 12-month follow-up period. Although early intraocular pressure reduction may differ with 360° trabeculotomy, a complete 360° incision may not be necessary to achieve optimal pressure reduction.

Keywords: Gonioscopy; Trabeculotomy; Glaucoma, open-angle; segmental GATT antiglaucoma agents; Intraocular pressure